Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A07 vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A07 and the Tecno Spark 40 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A07100 JOD | Tecno Spark 40 Pro105 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 100 (observed) | 105 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Performance index | 40/100 | 45/100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 64GB+ | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD HD+ | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+2 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 45 W |
| Release period | July 2025 | July 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A07 for, and who is the Tecno Spark 40 Pro for?
Price: the Galaxy A07 is JOD 5 cheaper (100 vs 105) — the Galaxy A07 price is an observed figure and the Tecno Spark 40 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro has a higher specification-based index (45 vs 40/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A07: PLS LCD HD+, 90 Hz; Tecno Spark 40 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A07 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy A07 suits price-first buyers; the Tecno Spark 40 Pro suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro has a higher specification-based index (45 vs 40/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A07: PLS LCD HD+, 90 Hz; Tecno Spark 40 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A07 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy A07 suits price-first buyers; the Tecno Spark 40 Pro suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.