Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A07 vs Vivo Y28 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A07 and the Vivo Y28
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A07100 JOD | Vivo Y28105 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 100 (observed) | 105 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Helio G85 |
| Performance index | 40/100 | 26/100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 64GB+ | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD HD+ | 6.68" LCD 90Hz |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+2 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 44 W |
| Release period | July 2025 | 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy A07 for, and who is the Vivo Y28 for?
Price: the Galaxy A07 is JOD 5 cheaper (100 vs 105) — the Galaxy A07 price is an observed figure and the Vivo Y28 price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy A07 has a higher specification-based index (40 vs 26/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A07: PLS LCD HD+, 90 Hz; Vivo Y28: LCD 90Hz, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 44 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y28 has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A07 is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo Y28 (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy A07 has a higher specification-based index (40 vs 26/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A07: PLS LCD HD+, 90 Hz; Vivo Y28: LCD 90Hz, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 44 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y28 has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A07 is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo Y28 (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.