Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A16 5G vs Moto G24 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A16 5G and the Moto G24
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A16 5G95 JOD | Moto G2494 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 95 (estimate) | 94 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Helio G85 |
| Performance index | 42/100 | 25/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.56" IPS LCD HD+ |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+5+2 MP | 50+2+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 15 W |
| Release period | October 2024 | February 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy A16 5G for, and who is the Moto G24 for?
Price: the Moto G24 is JOD 1 cheaper (94 vs 95) — the Moto G24 price is an estimate figure and the Galaxy A16 5G price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy A16 5G has a higher specification-based index (42 vs 25/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A16 5G: Super AMOLED, 90 Hz; Moto G24: IPS LCD HD+, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 15 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A16 5G 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Moto G24 50+2+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A16 5G for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Moto G24 for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 1 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy A16 5G has a higher specification-based index (42 vs 25/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A16 5G: Super AMOLED, 90 Hz; Moto G24: IPS LCD HD+, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 15 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A16 5G 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Moto G24 50+2+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A16 5G for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Moto G24 for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 1 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.