Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A17 4G vs Vivo Y300 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A17 4G and the Vivo Y300
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A17 4G135 JOD | Vivo Y300135 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 135 (observed) | 135 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Snapdragon 4 Gen2 |
| Performance index | 40/100 | 38/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED FHD+ | 6.67" AMOLED FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+5+2 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 80 W |
| Release period | September 2025 | November 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy A17 4G for, and who is the Vivo Y300 for?
Price: about the same (JOD 135) — observed/estimate.
Chipset: Helio G99 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (40 and 38/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A17 4G: AMOLED FHD+, 90 Hz; Vivo Y300: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 80 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A17 4G 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo Y300 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 135) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Helio G99 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (40 and 38/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A17 4G: AMOLED FHD+, 90 Hz; Vivo Y300: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 80 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A17 4G 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo Y300 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 135) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.