Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A17 5G vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A17 5G and the Tecno Camon 40 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A17 5G160 JOD | Tecno Camon 40 Pro160 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 160 (estimate) | 160 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Performance index | 44/100 | 46/100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED FHD+ | 6.78" AMOLED FHD+ 120Hz |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+5+2 MP | 50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 45 W |
| Release period | July 2025 | February 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A17 5G for, and who is the Tecno Camon 40 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 160) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Exynos 1330 vs Helio G100 Ultimate — practically the same tier on our index (44 and 46/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A17 5G: Super AMOLED FHD+, 90 Hz; Tecno Camon 40 Pro: AMOLED FHD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A17 5G 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 160) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 1330 vs Helio G100 Ultimate — practically the same tier on our index (44 and 46/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A17 5G: Super AMOLED FHD+, 90 Hz; Tecno Camon 40 Pro: AMOLED FHD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A17 5G 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 160) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.