Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A24 vs Moto G15 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A24 and the Moto G15
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A2489 JOD | Moto G1589 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 89 (estimate) | 89 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G99 | Helio G81 Extreme |
| Performance index | 39/100 | 30/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB | 128GB |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.72" IPS LCD FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+5+2 MP | 50+5 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 18 W |
| Release period | May 2023 | December 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy A24 for, and who is the Moto G15 for?
Price: about the same (JOD 89) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Galaxy A24 has a higher specification-based index (39 vs 30/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A24: Super AMOLED, 90 Hz; Moto G15: IPS LCD FHD+, 60 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 18 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A24 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Moto G15 50+5 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 89), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy A24 is higher on the chipset index (39 vs 30/100); the Moto G15 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy A24 has a higher specification-based index (39 vs 30/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A24: Super AMOLED, 90 Hz; Moto G15: IPS LCD FHD+, 60 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 18 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A24 50+5+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Moto G15 50+5 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 89), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy A24 is higher on the chipset index (39 vs 30/100); the Moto G15 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.

