Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A25 5G vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A25 5G and the Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A25 5G112 JOD | Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G112 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 112 (estimate) | 112 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Dimensity 6080 |
| Performance index | 42/100 | 38/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.78" AMOLED FHD+ 120Hz |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+2 MP | 108+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 70 W |
| Release period | January 2024 | February 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy A25 5G for, and who is the Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 112) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 6080 — practically the same tier on our index (42 and 38/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A25 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G: AMOLED FHD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 70 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A25 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G 108+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 112) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 1280 vs Dimensity 6080 — practically the same tier on our index (42 and 38/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A25 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G: AMOLED FHD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 70 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A25 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Pova 6 Pro 5G 108+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 112) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.