Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A26 5G vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A26 5G and the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A26 5G170 JOD | Tecno Spark 40 Pro+139 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 170 (observed) | 139 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Helio G200 |
| Performance index | 48/100 | 39/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.78" Curved AMOLED 144Hz |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+2 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 45 W |
| Release period | February 2025 | June 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A26 5G for, and who is the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ for?
Price: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is JOD 31 cheaper (139 vs 170) — the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ price is an estimate figure and the Galaxy A26 5G price is an observed figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy A26 5G has a higher specification-based index (48 vs 39/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A26 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Tecno Spark 40 Pro+: Curved AMOLED 144Hz, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A26 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A26 5G for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 31 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy A26 5G has a higher specification-based index (48 vs 39/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A26 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Tecno Spark 40 Pro+: Curved AMOLED 144Hz, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A26 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A26 5G for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 31 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.