Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A36 5G vs Vivo Y400 Pro 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A36 5G and the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A36 5G206 JOD | Vivo Y400 Pro 5G209 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 206 (observed) | 209 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen3 | Dimensity 7300 |
| Performance index | 52/100 | 54/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.77" Curved AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+5 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 90 W |
| Release period | February 2025 | June 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A36 5G for, and who is the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G for?
Price: the Galaxy A36 5G is JOD 3 cheaper (206 vs 209) — the Galaxy A36 5G price is an observed figure and the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: Snapdragon 6 Gen3 vs Dimensity 7300 — practically the same tier on our index (52 and 54/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A36 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Vivo Y400 Pro 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A36 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo Y400 Pro 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy A36 5G suits price-first buyers; the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Snapdragon 6 Gen3 vs Dimensity 7300 — practically the same tier on our index (52 and 54/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A36 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Vivo Y400 Pro 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A36 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo Y400 Pro 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy A36 5G suits price-first buyers; the Vivo Y400 Pro 5G suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.