Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A73 5G vs Vivo Y400 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A73 5G and the Vivo Y400 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A73 5G175 JOD | Vivo Y400 5G175 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 175 (estimate) | 175 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 778G | Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Performance index | 50/100 | 54/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED+ | 6.67" AMOLED FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+12+5+5 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 90 W |
| Release period | April 2022 | June 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A73 5G for, and who is the Vivo Y400 5G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 175) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 — practically the same tier on our index (50 and 54/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A73 5G: Super AMOLED+, 120 Hz; Vivo Y400 5G: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y400 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A73 5G 108+12+5+5 MP (4 lenses) vs Vivo Y400 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 175) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Snapdragon 778G vs Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 — practically the same tier on our index (50 and 54/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy A73 5G: Super AMOLED+, 120 Hz; Vivo Y400 5G: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y400 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A73 5G 108+12+5+5 MP (4 lenses) vs Vivo Y400 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 175) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.