Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S25 FE vs Poco F6 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S25 FE and the Poco F6 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S25 FE352 JOD | Poco F6 Pro299 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 352 (observed) | 299 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Snapdragon 8 Gen2 |
| Performance index | 85/100 | 82/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+ | 6.67" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12+8 MP | 50+8+2 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 4,900 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 120 W |
| Release period | August 2025 | May 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy S25 FE for, and who is the Poco F6 Pro for?
Price: the Poco F6 Pro is JOD 53 cheaper (299 vs 352) — the Poco F6 Pro price is an estimate figure and the Galaxy S25 FE price is an observed figure.
Chipset: Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (85 and 82/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Poco F6 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Poco F6 Pro 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Poco F6 Pro suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S25 FE suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (85 and 82/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Poco F6 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Poco F6 Pro 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Poco F6 Pro suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S25 FE suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.