Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200s in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo X200s
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S25 Ultra565 JOD | Vivo X200s699 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 565 (observed) | 699 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9400+ |
| Performance index | 96/100 | 91/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED 2K | 6.67" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 200+50+50+10 MP | 50+50+50 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 90 W |
| Release period | January 2025 | April 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy S25 Ultra for, and who is the Vivo X200s for?
Price: the Galaxy S25 Ultra is JOD 134 cheaper (565 vs 699) — the Galaxy S25 Ultra price is an observed figure and the Vivo X200s price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a higher specification-based index (96 vs 91/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy S25 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Vivo X200s: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X200s has 1,200 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S25 Ultra 200+50+50+10 MP (4 lenses) vs Vivo X200s 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy S25 Ultra is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X200s (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a higher specification-based index (96 vs 91/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy S25 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Vivo X200s: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X200s has 1,200 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S25 Ultra 200+50+50+10 MP (4 lenses) vs Vivo X200s 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy S25 Ultra is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X200s (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.