Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S26 Plus vs Vivo X300 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S26 Plus and the Vivo X300
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S26 Plus610 JOD | Vivo X300799 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 610 (observed) | 799 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2600 | Dimensity 9500 |
| Performance index | 93/100 | 97/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED 2K | 6.31" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+10+12 MP | 200+50+50 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 4,900 mAh | 6,040 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 90 W |
| Release period | February 2026 | September 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy S26 Plus for, and who is the Vivo X300 for?
Price: the Galaxy S26 Plus is JOD 189 cheaper (610 vs 799) — the Galaxy S26 Plus price is an observed figure and the Vivo X300 price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: Exynos 2600 vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (93 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S26 Plus: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Vivo X300: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X300 has 1,140 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S26 Plus 50+10+12 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X300 200+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy S26 Plus suits price-first buyers; the Vivo X300 suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 2600 vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (93 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S26 Plus: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Vivo X300: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X300 has 1,140 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S26 Plus 50+10+12 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X300 200+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy S26 Plus suits price-first buyers; the Vivo X300 suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.