Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S26 Ultra666 JOD | Xiaomi 17T Pro535 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 666 (observed) | 535 (observed) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 | Dimensity 9500 |
| Performance index | 98/100 | 97/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.9" AMOLED 2K | 6.83" AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 200+50+50+10 MP | 50+50+12 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 60 W | 100 W |
| Release period | February 2026 | May 2026 |
Who is the Galaxy S26 Ultra for, and who is the Xiaomi 17T Pro for?
Price: the Xiaomi 17T Pro is JOD 131 cheaper (535 vs 666) — the Xiaomi 17T Pro price is an observed figure and the Galaxy S26 Ultra price is an observed figure.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (98 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S26 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17T Pro: AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 60 W vs 100 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has 2,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S26 Ultra 200+50+50+10 MP (4 lenses) vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 50+50+12 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Xiaomi 17T Pro suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S26 Ultra suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (98 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S26 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17T Pro: AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 60 W vs 100 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has 2,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S26 Ultra 200+50+50+10 MP (4 lenses) vs Xiaomi 17T Pro 50+50+12 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Xiaomi 17T Pro suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S26 Ultra suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.