Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy Z Flip 6 vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy Z Flip 6 and the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy Z Flip 6419 JOD | Motorola Razr 40 Ultra419 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 419 (estimate) | 419 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen3 | Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 |
| Performance index | 86/100 | 77/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" Foldable AMOLED | 6.9" Foldable OLED |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12 MP | 12+13 MP |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 4,000 mAh | 3,800 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 30 W |
| Release period | June 2024 | June 2023 |
Who is the Galaxy Z Flip 6 for, and who is the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra for?
Price: about the same (JOD 419) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Galaxy Z Flip 6 has a higher specification-based index (86 vs 77/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy Z Flip 6: Foldable AMOLED, 120 Hz; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Foldable OLED, 165 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 30 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy Z Flip 6 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 12+13 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 419), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy Z Flip 6 is higher on the chipset index (86 vs 77/100); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy Z Flip 6 has a higher specification-based index (86 vs 77/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy Z Flip 6: Foldable AMOLED, 120 Hz; Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Foldable OLED, 165 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 30 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy Z Flip 6 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra 12+13 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 419), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy Z Flip 6 is higher on the chipset index (86 vs 77/100); the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.