Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs iPhone 16 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and the iPhone 16
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7540 JOD | iPhone 16549 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 540 (observed) | 549 (observed) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2500 | Apple A18 |
| Performance index | 88/100 | 89/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+ | 6.1" OLED FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12 MP | 48+12 MP |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 12 MP |
| Battery | 4,300 mAh | 3,561 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 20 W |
| Release period | June 2025 | August 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for, and who is the iPhone 16 for?
Price: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is JOD 9 cheaper (540 vs 549) — the Galaxy Z Flip 7 price is an observed figure and the iPhone 16 price is an observed figure.
Chipset: Exynos 2500 vs Apple A18 — practically the same tier on our index (88 and 89/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy Z Flip 7: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; iPhone 16: OLED FHD+, 60 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 20 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 has 739 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy Z Flip 7 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs iPhone 16 48+12 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 6.9-inch — with a visible crease); the iPhone 16 is a single-screen phone (6.1-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Platform: the iPhone 16 runs iOS and the Galaxy Z Flip 7 runs Android — in practice the biggest difference: your apps, accessories and other devices (watch/laptop) decide more than any row in the table.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 suits price-first buyers; the iPhone 16 suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 2500 vs Apple A18 — practically the same tier on our index (88 and 89/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy Z Flip 7: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; iPhone 16: OLED FHD+, 60 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 20 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 has 739 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy Z Flip 7 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs iPhone 16 48+12 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 6.9-inch — with a visible crease); the iPhone 16 is a single-screen phone (6.1-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Platform: the iPhone 16 runs iOS and the Galaxy Z Flip 7 runs Android — in practice the biggest difference: your apps, accessories and other devices (watch/laptop) decide more than any row in the table.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 suits price-first buyers; the iPhone 16 suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.