Head to head · October 2026
Honor Magic 7 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor Magic 7 Pro and the Oppo Find X9
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor Magic 7 Pro749 JOD | Oppo Find X9749 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 749 (estimate) | 749 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9500 |
| Performance index | 94/100 | 96/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.8" OLED 1.5K | 6.59" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+200+50 MP | 50+50+32 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 5,850 mAh | 7,025 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 100 W | 80 W |
| Release period | 2025 | October 2025 |
Who is the Honor Magic 7 Pro for, and who is the Oppo Find X9 for?
Price: about the same (JOD 749) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (94 and 96/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Honor Magic 7 Pro: OLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Oppo Find X9: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 100 W vs 80 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Oppo Find X9 has 1,175 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor Magic 7 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Oppo Find X9 50+50+32 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 749) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (94 and 96/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Honor Magic 7 Pro: OLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Oppo Find X9: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 100 W vs 80 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Oppo Find X9 has 1,175 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor Magic 7 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Oppo Find X9 50+50+32 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 749) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.