Head to head · October 2026
Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Poco X7 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Poco X7 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Infinix GT 30 Pro235 JOD | Poco X7 Pro249 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 235 (observed) | 249 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Dimensity 8400 Ultra |
| Performance index | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K | 6.67" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+8 MP | 50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Battery | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 90 W |
| Release period | May 2025 | 2025 |
Who is the Infinix GT 30 Pro for, and who is the Poco X7 Pro for?
Price: the Infinix GT 30 Pro is JOD 14 cheaper (235 vs 249) — the Infinix GT 30 Pro price is an observed figure and the Poco X7 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Poco X7 Pro has a higher specification-based index (78 vs 68/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Infinix GT 30 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz; Poco X7 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco X7 Pro has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Infinix GT 30 Pro 108+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco X7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Poco X7 Pro for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Infinix GT 30 Pro for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 14 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco X7 Pro has a higher specification-based index (78 vs 68/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Infinix GT 30 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz; Poco X7 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco X7 Pro has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Infinix GT 30 Pro 108+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco X7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Poco X7 Pro for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Infinix GT 30 Pro for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 14 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.

