Head to head · October 2026
Infinix Zero 40 vs Vivo iQOO 8 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Infinix Zero 40 and the Vivo iQOO 8 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Infinix Zero 40209 JOD | Vivo iQOO 8 Pro209 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 209 (estimate) | 209 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8200 Ultimate | Snapdragon 888+ |
| Performance index | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+50 MP | 50+48+16 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 120 W |
| Release period | August 2024 | August 2021 |
Who is the Infinix Zero 40 for, and who is the Vivo iQOO 8 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 209) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 8 Pro has a higher specification-based index (69 vs 64/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Infinix Zero 40: AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz, 144 Hz; Vivo iQOO 8 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Infinix Zero 40 has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Infinix Zero 40 108+50 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo iQOO 8 Pro 50+48+16 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 209), so price does not decide it — the Vivo iQOO 8 Pro is higher on the chipset index (69 vs 64/100); the Infinix Zero 40 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 8 Pro has a higher specification-based index (69 vs 64/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Infinix Zero 40: AMOLED 1.5K 144Hz, 144 Hz; Vivo iQOO 8 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Infinix Zero 40 has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Infinix Zero 40 108+50 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo iQOO 8 Pro 50+48+16 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 209), so price does not decide it — the Vivo iQOO 8 Pro is higher on the chipset index (69 vs 64/100); the Infinix Zero 40 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.

