Head to head · October 2026
itel Super 26 Ultra vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the itel Super 26 Ultra and the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| itel Super 26 Ultra145 JOD | Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G145 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 145 (estimate) | 145 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7300 | Helio G99 Ultra |
| Performance index | 28/100 | 42/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED FHD+ | 6.67" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+2 MP | 200+8+2 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 18 W | 67 W |
| Release period | September 2025 | January 2024 |
Who is the itel Super 26 Ultra for, and who is the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 145) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G has a higher specification-based index (42 vs 28/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: itel Super 26 Ultra: AMOLED FHD+, 144 Hz; Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 18 W vs 67 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the itel Super 26 Ultra has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: itel Super 26 Ultra 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 200+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 145), so price does not decide it — the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is higher on the chipset index (42 vs 28/100); the itel Super 26 Ultra makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G has a higher specification-based index (42 vs 28/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: itel Super 26 Ultra: AMOLED FHD+, 144 Hz; Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 18 W vs 67 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the itel Super 26 Ultra has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: itel Super 26 Ultra 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 200+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 145), so price does not decide it — the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is higher on the chipset index (42 vs 28/100); the itel Super 26 Ultra makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.