Head to head · October 2026
Moto G96 5G vs Poco X7 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Moto G96 5G and the Poco X7 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Moto G96 5G249 JOD | Poco X7 Pro249 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 249 (estimate) | 249 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 7s Gen2 | Dimensity 8400 Ultra |
| Performance index | 52/100 | 78/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.67" Curved AMOLED 1.5K | 6.67" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8 MP | 50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Battery | 5,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 33 W | 90 W |
| Release period | June 2025 | 2025 |
Who is the Moto G96 5G for, and who is the Poco X7 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 249) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Poco X7 Pro has a higher specification-based index (78 vs 52/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Moto G96 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz; Poco X7 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 33 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco X7 Pro has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Moto G96 5G 50+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco X7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 249), so price does not decide it — the Poco X7 Pro is higher on the chipset index (78 vs 52/100); the Moto G96 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco X7 Pro has a higher specification-based index (78 vs 52/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Moto G96 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz; Poco X7 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 33 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco X7 Pro has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Moto G96 5G 50+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco X7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 249), so price does not decide it — the Poco X7 Pro is higher on the chipset index (78 vs 52/100); the Moto G96 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.