Head to head · October 2026
Poco F7 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Poco F7 and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Poco F7379 JOD | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G359 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 379 (estimate) | 359 (observed) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8s Gen4 | Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Performance index | 88/100 | 57/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.83" AMOLED 1.5K | 6.78" Curved AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8 MP | 50+50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,500 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 90 W | 45 W |
| Release period | June 2025 | March 2026 |
Who is the Poco F7 for, and who is the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G for?
Price: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G is JOD 20 cheaper (359 vs 379) — the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G price is an observed figure and the Poco F7 price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Poco F7 has a higher specification-based index (88 vs 57/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Poco F7: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 90 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Poco F7 50+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G 50+50+8 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Poco F7 for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 20 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco F7 has a higher specification-based index (88 vs 57/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Poco F7: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 90 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Poco F7 50+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G 50+50+8 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Poco F7 for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra 5G for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 20 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.