Head to head · October 2026
Redmi Note 15 4G vs Tecno Spark Slim in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Redmi Note 15 4G and the Tecno Spark Slim
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Redmi Note 15 4G165 JOD | Tecno Spark Slim165 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 165 (observed) | 165 (observed) |
| Chipset | Helio G100 Ultra | Helio G200 |
| Performance index | 45/100 | 39/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.77" AMOLED FHD+ | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+2 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Release period | 2026 | September 2025 |
Who is the Redmi Note 15 4G for, and who is the Tecno Spark Slim for?
Price: about the same (JOD 165) — observed/observed.
Chipset: the Redmi Note 15 4G has a higher specification-based index (45 vs 39/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Redmi Note 15 4G: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz; Tecno Spark Slim: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 33 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Redmi Note 15 4G has 840 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Redmi Note 15 4G 108+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Spark Slim 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 165), so price does not decide it — the Redmi Note 15 4G is higher on the chipset index (45 vs 39/100); the Tecno Spark Slim makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Redmi Note 15 4G has a higher specification-based index (45 vs 39/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Redmi Note 15 4G: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz; Tecno Spark Slim: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 33 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Redmi Note 15 4G has 840 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Redmi Note 15 4G 108+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Spark Slim 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 165), so price does not decide it — the Redmi Note 15 4G is higher on the chipset index (45 vs 39/100); the Tecno Spark Slim makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.