Head to head · October 2026
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs Vivo Y39 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo Y39 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Tecno Spark 40 Pro+139 JOD | Vivo Y39 5G139 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 139 (estimate) | 139 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G200 | Snapdragon 4 Gen2 |
| Performance index | 39/100 | 38/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.78" Curved AMOLED 144Hz | 6.68" LCD 120Hz |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,160 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 44 W |
| Release period | June 2025 | January 2025 |
Who is the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ for, and who is the Vivo Y39 5G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 139) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Helio G200 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (39 and 38/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+: Curved AMOLED 144Hz, 144 Hz; Vivo Y39 5G: LCD 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 44 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y39 5G has 1,340 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ 50 MP (1 lens) vs Vivo Y39 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 139) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Helio G200 vs Snapdragon 4 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (39 and 38/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+: Curved AMOLED 144Hz, 144 Hz; Vivo Y39 5G: LCD 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 44 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo Y39 5G has 1,340 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ 50 MP (1 lens) vs Vivo Y39 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 139) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.