Head to head · October 2026
Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Vivo X200 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Vivo X200 Pro849 JOD | Xiaomi 17 Ultra839 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 849 (estimate) | 839 (observed) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 9400 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 |
| Performance index | 92/100 | 98/100 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 512GB+ |
| Display | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K+ | 6.9" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+200+50 MP | 50+200+50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Release period | October 2024 | January 2026 |
Who is the Vivo X200 Pro for, and who is the Xiaomi 17 Ultra for?
Price: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is JOD 10 cheaper (839 vs 849) — the Xiaomi 17 Ultra price is an observed figure and the Vivo X200 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a higher specification-based index (98 vs 92/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo X200 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K+, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17 Ultra: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Camera: Vivo X200 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X200 Pro (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has a higher specification-based index (98 vs 92/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo X200 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K+, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17 Ultra: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Camera: Vivo X200 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X200 Pro (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.