Head to head · October 2026
Vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Vivo X200 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Vivo X200 Ultra949 JOD | Xiaomi 17 Pro949 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 949 (estimate) | 949 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 |
| Performance index | 94/100 | 97/100 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.82" AMOLED 2K | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+50+200 MP | 50+50+50 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 6,300 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 90 W | 100 W |
| Release period | March 2025 | September 2025 |
Who is the Vivo X200 Ultra for, and who is the Xiaomi 17 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 949) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 — practically the same tier on our index (94 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Vivo X200 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 90 W vs 100 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Vivo X200 Ultra 50+50+200 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 17 Pro 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 949) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Elite vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 — practically the same tier on our index (94 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Vivo X200 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 90 W vs 100 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Vivo X200 Ultra 50+50+200 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 17 Pro 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 949) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.