Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A35 5G vs Galaxy A36 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A35 5G and the Galaxy A36 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A35 5G220 JOD | Galaxy A36 5G206 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 220 (observed) | 206 (observed) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 6 Gen3 |
| Performance index | 47/100 | 52/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+5 MP | 50+8+5 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 12 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 45 W |
| Release period | February 2024 | February 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A35 5G for, and who is the Galaxy A36 5G for?
Price: the Galaxy A36 5G is JOD 14 cheaper (206 vs 220) — the Galaxy A36 5G price is an observed figure and the Galaxy A35 5G price is an observed figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy A36 5G has a higher specification-based index (52 vs 47/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A35 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Galaxy A36 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A36 5G is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Galaxy A35 5G (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy A36 5G has a higher specification-based index (52 vs 47/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A35 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Galaxy A36 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A36 5G is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Galaxy A35 5G (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
What changed in the Galaxy A36 5G versus the Galaxy A35 5G?
- Chipset: Exynos 1380 → Snapdragon 6 Gen3 (performance index 47 → 52)
- Charging: 25 → 45 W
- Front camera: 13 → 12 MP
- Display: 6.6 → 6.7 inches
Today's price gap is JOD 14 in favour of the Galaxy A36 5G.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.