Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A35 5G vs Honor X9c in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A35 5G and the Honor X9c
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A35 5G220 JOD | Honor X9c220 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 220 (observed) | 220 (observed) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 6 Gen1 |
| Performance index | 47/100 | 52/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.78" Curved AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+5 MP | 108+5 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 66 W |
| Release period | February 2024 | November 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy A35 5G for, and who is the Honor X9c for?
Price: about the same (JOD 220) — observed/observed.
Chipset: the Honor X9c has a higher specification-based index (52 vs 47/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A35 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Honor X9c: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 66 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Honor X9c has 1,600 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A35 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Honor X9c 108+5 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 220), so price does not decide it — the Honor X9c is higher on the chipset index (52 vs 47/100); the Galaxy A35 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Honor X9c has a higher specification-based index (52 vs 47/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A35 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Honor X9c: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 66 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Honor X9c has 1,600 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A35 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Honor X9c 108+5 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 220), so price does not decide it — the Honor X9c is higher on the chipset index (52 vs 47/100); the Galaxy A35 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.