Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A35 5G vs Honor X7d in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A35 5G and the Honor X7d
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A35 5G220 JOD | Honor X7d145 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 220 (observed) | 145 (observed) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 685 |
| Performance index | 47/100 | 32/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.77" HD+ 120Hz |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+5 MP | 108+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 35 W |
| Release period | February 2024 | August 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy A35 5G for, and who is the Honor X7d for?
Price: the Honor X7d is JOD 75 cheaper (145 vs 220) — the Honor X7d price is an observed figure and the Galaxy A35 5G price is an observed figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy A35 5G has a higher specification-based index (47 vs 32/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A35 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Honor X7d: HD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 35 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Honor X7d has 1,500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A35 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Honor X7d 108+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A35 5G for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Honor X7d for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 75 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy A35 5G has a higher specification-based index (47 vs 32/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A35 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Honor X7d: HD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 35 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Honor X7d has 1,500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy A35 5G 50+8+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Honor X7d 108+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy A35 5G for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Honor X7d for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 75 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.