Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy F34 5G vs Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy F34 5G and the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy F34 5G98 JOD | Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G98 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 98 (estimate) | 98 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1280 | Snapdragon 695 5G |
| Performance index | 42/100 | 46/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB | 64GB+ |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.67" AMOLED FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+2 MP | 108+8+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 67 W |
| Release period | September 2023 | February 2022 |
Who is the Galaxy F34 5G for, and who is the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 98) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Exynos 1280 vs Snapdragon 695 5G — practically the same tier on our index (42 and 46/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy F34 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 67 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy F34 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy F34 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 108+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 98) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 1280 vs Snapdragon 695 5G — practically the same tier on our index (42 and 46/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy F34 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 67 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy F34 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy F34 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 108+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 98) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.