Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy M35 5G vs Vivo Y300 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy M35 5G and the Vivo Y300
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy M35 5G135 JOD | Vivo Y300135 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 135 (estimate) | 135 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Snapdragon 4 Gen2 |
| Performance index | 47/100 | 38/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 128GB+ |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED+ | 6.67" AMOLED FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+8+2 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 80 W |
| Release period | July 2024 | November 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy M35 5G for, and who is the Vivo Y300 for?
Price: about the same (JOD 135) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Galaxy M35 5G has a higher specification-based index (47 vs 38/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy M35 5G: Super AMOLED+, 120 Hz; Vivo Y300: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 80 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy M35 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy M35 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo Y300 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 135), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy M35 5G is higher on the chipset index (47 vs 38/100); the Vivo Y300 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy M35 5G has a higher specification-based index (47 vs 38/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy M35 5G: Super AMOLED+, 120 Hz; Vivo Y300: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 80 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy M35 5G has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy M35 5G 50+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo Y300 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 135), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy M35 5G is higher on the chipset index (47 vs 38/100); the Vivo Y300 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.