Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S25 FE vs Infinix GT 50 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S25 FE and the Infinix GT 50 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S25 FE352 JOD | Infinix GT 50 Pro339 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 352 (observed) | 339 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Dimensity 8400 Ultimate |
| Performance index | 85/100 | 79/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+ | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12+8 MP | 50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 4,900 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Release period | August 2025 | March 2026 |
Who is the Galaxy S25 FE for, and who is the Infinix GT 50 Pro for?
Price: the Infinix GT 50 Pro is JOD 13 cheaper (339 vs 352) — the Infinix GT 50 Pro price is an estimate figure and the Galaxy S25 FE price is an observed figure.
Chipset: the Galaxy S25 FE has a higher specification-based index (85 vs 79/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Infinix GT 50 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Battery: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has 1,600 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Infinix GT 50 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Infinix GT 50 Pro suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S25 FE suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy S25 FE has a higher specification-based index (85 vs 79/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Infinix GT 50 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Battery: the Infinix GT 50 Pro has 1,600 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Infinix GT 50 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Infinix GT 50 Pro suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S25 FE suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.