Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S25 FE vs Vivo X90s in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S25 FE and the Vivo X90s
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S25 FE352 JOD | Vivo X90s355 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 352 (observed) | 355 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Dimensity 9200+ |
| Performance index | 85/100 | 81/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+ | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12+8 MP | 50+12+12 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 4,900 mAh | 4,810 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 120 W |
| Release period | August 2025 | June 2023 |
Who is the Galaxy S25 FE for, and who is the Vivo X90s for?
Price: the Galaxy S25 FE is JOD 3 cheaper (352 vs 355) — the Galaxy S25 FE price is an observed figure and the Vivo X90s price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: Exynos 2400 vs Dimensity 9200+ — practically the same tier on our index (85 and 81/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Vivo X90s: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X90s 50+12+12 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy S25 FE is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X90s (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 2400 vs Dimensity 9200+ — practically the same tier on our index (85 and 81/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Vivo X90s: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X90s 50+12+12 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Galaxy S25 FE is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X90s (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.