Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Vivo X300 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and the Vivo X300
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy Z Flip 7540 JOD | Vivo X300799 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 540 (observed) | 799 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2500 | Dimensity 9500 |
| Performance index | 88/100 | 97/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+ | 6.31" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12 MP | 200+50+50 MP |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 4,300 mAh | 6,040 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 90 W |
| Release period | June 2025 | September 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for, and who is the Vivo X300 for?
Price: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is JOD 259 cheaper (540 vs 799) — the Galaxy Z Flip 7 price is an observed figure and the Vivo X300 price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Vivo X300 has a higher specification-based index (97 vs 88/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy Z Flip 7: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Vivo X300: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X300 has 1,740 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy Z Flip 7 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo X300 200+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 6.9-inch — with a visible crease); the Vivo X300 is a single-screen phone (6.31-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Who is it for? The Vivo X300 for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 259 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Vivo X300 has a higher specification-based index (97 vs 88/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy Z Flip 7: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Vivo X300: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X300 has 1,740 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy Z Flip 7 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo X300 200+50+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 6.9-inch — with a visible crease); the Vivo X300 is a single-screen phone (6.31-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Who is it for? The Vivo X300 for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 259 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.