Head to head · October 2026
Honor 400 Lite vs Poco M7 Pro 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor 400 Lite and the Poco M7 Pro 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor 400 Lite160 JOD | Poco M7 Pro 5G139 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 160 (observed) | 139 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Dimensity 7025 Ultra |
| Performance index | 44/100 | 44/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED FHD+ | 6.67" AMOLED FHD+ |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+5 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Battery | 5,230 mAh | 5,110 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 35 W | 45 W |
| Release period | April 2025 | December 2024 |
Who is the Honor 400 Lite for, and who is the Poco M7 Pro 5G for?
Price: the Poco M7 Pro 5G is JOD 21 cheaper (139 vs 160) — the Poco M7 Pro 5G price is an estimate figure and the Honor 400 Lite price is an observed figure.
Chipset: Dimensity 7025 Ultra vs Dimensity 7025 Ultra — practically the same tier on our index (44 and 44/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Charging: rated power is 35 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Honor 400 Lite 108+5 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco M7 Pro 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Poco M7 Pro 5G suits price-first buyers; the Honor 400 Lite suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Dimensity 7025 Ultra vs Dimensity 7025 Ultra — practically the same tier on our index (44 and 44/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Charging: rated power is 35 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Honor 400 Lite 108+5 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco M7 Pro 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Poco M7 Pro 5G suits price-first buyers; the Honor 400 Lite suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.