Head to head · October 2026
Honor 400 Lite vs Tecno Spark Slim in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor 400 Lite and the Tecno Spark Slim
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor 400 Lite160 JOD | Tecno Spark Slim165 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 160 (observed) | 165 (observed) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 7025 Ultra | Helio G200 |
| Performance index | 44/100 | 39/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED FHD+ | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+5 MP | 50 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 5,230 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 35 W | 45 W |
| Release period | April 2025 | September 2025 |
Who is the Honor 400 Lite for, and who is the Tecno Spark Slim for?
Price: the Honor 400 Lite is JOD 5 cheaper (160 vs 165) — the Honor 400 Lite price is an observed figure and the Tecno Spark Slim price is an observed figure.
Chipset: the Honor 400 Lite has a higher specification-based index (44 vs 39/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor 400 Lite: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz; Tecno Spark Slim: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 35 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Honor 400 Lite 108+5 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Spark Slim 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Honor 400 Lite is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Tecno Spark Slim (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Honor 400 Lite has a higher specification-based index (44 vs 39/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor 400 Lite: AMOLED FHD+, 120 Hz; Tecno Spark Slim: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 35 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Honor 400 Lite 108+5 MP (2 lenses) vs Tecno Spark Slim 50 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Honor 400 Lite is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Tecno Spark Slim (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.