Head to head · October 2026
Honor 90 vs Tecno Pova Slim 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor 90 and the Tecno Pova Slim 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor 90209 JOD | Tecno Pova Slim 5G209 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 209 (estimate) | 209 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 7 Gen1 | Dimensity 6400 5G+ |
| Performance index | 50/100 | 45/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Curved AMOLED 1.5K | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 200+12+2 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 66 W | 45 W |
| Release period | June 2023 | August 2025 |
Who is the Honor 90 for, and who is the Tecno Pova Slim 5G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 209) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Honor 90 has a higher specification-based index (50 vs 45/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor 90: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Tecno Pova Slim 5G: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Honor 90 200+12+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Pova Slim 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 209), so price does not decide it — the Honor 90 is higher on the chipset index (50 vs 45/100); the Tecno Pova Slim 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Honor 90 has a higher specification-based index (50 vs 45/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor 90: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Tecno Pova Slim 5G: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Honor 90 200+12+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Pova Slim 5G 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 209), so price does not decide it — the Honor 90 is higher on the chipset index (50 vs 45/100); the Tecno Pova Slim 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.