Head to head · October 2026
Honor GT vs Poco F7 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor GT and the Poco F7 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor GT429 JOD | Poco F7 Pro429 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 429 (estimate) | 429 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen3 | Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| Performance index | 88/100 | 88/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED 1.5K | 6.67" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12 MP | 50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Battery | 5,300 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 100 W | 90 W |
| Release period | December 2024 | April 2025 |
Who is the Honor GT for, and who is the Poco F7 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 429) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Gen3 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen3 — practically the same tier on our index (88 and 88/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Honor GT: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Poco F7 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 100 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco F7 Pro has 700 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor GT 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco F7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 429) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Snapdragon 8 Gen3 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen3 — practically the same tier on our index (88 and 88/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Honor GT: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Poco F7 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 100 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco F7 Pro has 700 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor GT 50+12 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco F7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 429) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.