Head to head · October 2026
Honor Magic 5 Ultimate vs Poco F7 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor Magic 5 Ultimate and the Poco F7 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor Magic 5 Ultimate429 JOD | Poco F7 Pro429 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 429 (estimate) | 429 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen2 | Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| Performance index | 83/100 | 88/100 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.81" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K | 6.67" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+50+50 MP | 50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| Battery | 5,450 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 66 W | 90 W |
| Release period | April 2023 | April 2025 |
Who is the Honor Magic 5 Ultimate for, and who is the Poco F7 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 429) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Poco F7 Pro has a higher specification-based index (88 vs 83/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor Magic 5 Ultimate: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Poco F7 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco F7 Pro has 550 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor Magic 5 Ultimate 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Poco F7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 429), so price does not decide it — the Poco F7 Pro is higher on the chipset index (88 vs 83/100); the Honor Magic 5 Ultimate makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco F7 Pro has a higher specification-based index (88 vs 83/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor Magic 5 Ultimate: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Poco F7 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Poco F7 Pro has 550 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor Magic 5 Ultimate 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Poco F7 Pro 50+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 429), so price does not decide it — the Poco F7 Pro is higher on the chipset index (88 vs 83/100); the Honor Magic 5 Ultimate makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.