Head to head · October 2026
Infinix GT 30 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Infinix GT 30 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Infinix GT 30 Pro235 JOD | Vivo iQOO 9 Pro239 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 235 (observed) | 239 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Snapdragon 8 Gen1 |
| Performance index | 68/100 | 72/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+8 MP | 50+50+16 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 5,500 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 120 W |
| Release period | May 2025 | January 2022 |
Who is the Infinix GT 30 Pro for, and who is the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro for?
Price: the Infinix GT 30 Pro is JOD 4 cheaper (235 vs 239) — the Infinix GT 30 Pro price is an observed figure and the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: Dimensity 8350 Ultimate vs Snapdragon 8 Gen1 — practically the same tier on our index (68 and 72/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Infinix GT 30 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz; Vivo iQOO 9 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Infinix GT 30 Pro has 800 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Infinix GT 30 Pro 108+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro 50+50+16 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Infinix GT 30 Pro suits price-first buyers; the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Dimensity 8350 Ultimate vs Snapdragon 8 Gen1 — practically the same tier on our index (68 and 72/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Infinix GT 30 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz; Vivo iQOO 9 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Infinix GT 30 Pro has 800 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Infinix GT 30 Pro 108+8 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro 50+50+16 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Infinix GT 30 Pro suits price-first buyers; the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.