Head to head · October 2026

iPhone 16 Pro vs Vivo X200 Pro in Jordan

A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.

iPhone 16 ProiPhone 16 Pro689 JODVSPrice gap: JOD 160 (≈ $225)Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro849 JOD

Spec differences between the iPhone 16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Pro

The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.

iPhone 16 Pro689 JODVivo X200 Pro849 JOD
Price (JOD)689 (observed)849 (estimate)
ChipsetApple A18 ProDimensity 9400
Performance index93/10092/100
RAM8 GB16 GB
Base storage128GB+512GB
Display6.3" OLED 1.5K6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K+
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Rear camera48+12+48 MP50+200+50 MP
Front camera12 MP32 MP
Battery3,355 mAh6,000 mAh
Rated charging power25 W90 W
Release periodAugust 2024October 2024

Who is the iPhone 16 Pro for, and who is the Vivo X200 Pro for?

Price: the iPhone 16 Pro is JOD 160 cheaper (689 vs 849) — the iPhone 16 Pro price is an observed figure and the Vivo X200 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: Apple A18 Pro vs Dimensity 9400 — practically the same tier on our index (93 and 92/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: iPhone 16 Pro: OLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Vivo X200 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K+, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X200 Pro has 2,645 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: iPhone 16 Pro 48+12+48 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X200 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Platform: the iPhone 16 Pro runs iOS and the Vivo X200 Pro runs Android — in practice the biggest difference: your apps, accessories and other devices (watch/laptop) decide more than any row in the table.
Who is it for? The iPhone 16 Pro is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X200 Pro (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.

Related comparisons

All ready-made comparisons