Head to head · October 2026
Poco C75 vs Vivo Y17s in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Poco C75 and the Vivo Y17s
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Poco C7579 JOD | Vivo Y17s79 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 79 (estimate) | 79 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G81 Ultra | Helio G85 |
| Performance index | 29/100 | 24/100 |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 128GB |
| Display | 6.88" HD+ 120Hz | 6.56" LCD 90Hz |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+2 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,160 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Release period | October 2024 | September 2023 |
Who is the Poco C75 for, and who is the Vivo Y17s for?
Price: about the same (JOD 79) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Poco C75 has a higher specification-based index (29 vs 24/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Poco C75: HD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz; Vivo Y17s: LCD 90Hz, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 18 W vs 15 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Poco C75 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo Y17s 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 79), so price does not decide it — the Poco C75 is higher on the chipset index (29 vs 24/100); the Vivo Y17s makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco C75 has a higher specification-based index (29 vs 24/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Poco C75: HD+ 120Hz, 120 Hz; Vivo Y17s: LCD 90Hz, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 18 W vs 15 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Poco C75 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Vivo Y17s 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 79), so price does not decide it — the Poco C75 is higher on the chipset index (29 vs 24/100); the Vivo Y17s makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.