Head to head · October 2026
Poco F5 Pro vs Tecno Pova Curve 5G in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Poco F5 Pro and the Tecno Pova Curve 5G
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Poco F5 Pro225 JOD | Tecno Pova Curve 5G225 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 225 (estimate) | 225 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Performance index | 77/100 | 52/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.67" AMOLED 2K | 6.78" Curved AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Rear camera | 64+8+2 MP | 64+8 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP |
| Battery | 5,160 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Release period | May 2023 | August 2025 |
Who is the Poco F5 Pro for, and who is the Tecno Pova Curve 5G for?
Price: about the same (JOD 225) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Poco F5 Pro has a higher specification-based index (77 vs 52/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Poco F5 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Tecno Pova Curve 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 67 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Poco F5 Pro 64+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Pova Curve 5G 64+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 225), so price does not decide it — the Poco F5 Pro is higher on the chipset index (77 vs 52/100); the Tecno Pova Curve 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco F5 Pro has a higher specification-based index (77 vs 52/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Poco F5 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz; Tecno Pova Curve 5G: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 144 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 67 W vs 45 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Poco F5 Pro 64+8+2 MP (3 lenses) vs Tecno Pova Curve 5G 64+8 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 225), so price does not decide it — the Poco F5 Pro is higher on the chipset index (77 vs 52/100); the Tecno Pova Curve 5G makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.