Head to head · October 2026
Honor X9c vs Poco F5 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Honor X9c and the Poco F5 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Honor X9c220 JOD | Poco F5 Pro225 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 220 (observed) | 225 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen1 | Snapdragon 8+ Gen1 |
| Performance index | 52/100 | 77/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.78" Curved AMOLED 1.5K | 6.67" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 108+5 MP | 64+8+2 MP |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 6,600 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 66 W | 67 W |
| Release period | November 2024 | May 2023 |
Who is the Honor X9c for, and who is the Poco F5 Pro for?
Price: the Honor X9c is JOD 5 cheaper (220 vs 225) — the Honor X9c price is an observed figure and the Poco F5 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Poco F5 Pro has a higher specification-based index (77 vs 52/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor X9c: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Poco F5 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 67 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Honor X9c has 1,440 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor X9c 108+5 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco F5 Pro 64+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Poco F5 Pro for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Honor X9c for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 5 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Poco F5 Pro has a higher specification-based index (77 vs 52/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor X9c: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Poco F5 Pro: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 67 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Honor X9c has 1,440 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor X9c 108+5 MP (2 lenses) vs Poco F5 Pro 64+8+2 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Poco F5 Pro for those who want a higher chipset tier (heavy games, intensive use, a longer runway before it feels slow); the Honor X9c for tighter budgets and everyday use — the gap is JOD 5 in its favour.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.