Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy A56 5G vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy A56 5G and the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy A56 5G255 JOD | Vivo iQOO 9 Pro239 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 255 (observed) | 239 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1580 | Snapdragon 8 Gen1 |
| Performance index | 58/100 | 72/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 128GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12+5 MP | 50+50+16 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 120 W |
| Release period | February 2025 | January 2022 |
Who is the Galaxy A56 5G for, and who is the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro for?
Price: the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro is JOD 16 cheaper (239 vs 255) — the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro price is an estimate figure and the Galaxy A56 5G price is an observed figure.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro has a higher specification-based index (72 vs 58/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A56 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Vivo iQOO 9 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A56 5G 50+12+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro 50+50+16 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Vivo iQOO 9 Pro is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Galaxy A56 5G (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 9 Pro has a higher specification-based index (72 vs 58/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy A56 5G: Super AMOLED, 120 Hz; Vivo iQOO 9 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 120 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy A56 5G 50+12+5 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo iQOO 9 Pro 50+50+16 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? The Vivo iQOO 9 Pro is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Galaxy A56 5G (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.