Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S25 FE vs Honor Magic 5 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S25 FE and the Honor Magic 5
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S25 FE352 JOD | Honor Magic 5299 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 352 (observed) | 299 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 2400 | Snapdragon 8 Gen2 |
| Performance index | 85/100 | 82/100 |
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB | 256GB |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+ | 6.73" Curved AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+12+8 MP | 54+50+32 MP |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Battery | 4,900 mAh | 5,100 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 45 W | 66 W |
| Release period | August 2025 | March 2023 |
Who is the Galaxy S25 FE for, and who is the Honor Magic 5 for?
Price: the Honor Magic 5 is JOD 53 cheaper (299 vs 352) — the Honor Magic 5 price is an estimate figure and the Galaxy S25 FE price is an observed figure.
Chipset: Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (85 and 82/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Honor Magic 5: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 66 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Honor Magic 5 54+50+32 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Honor Magic 5 suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S25 FE suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Exynos 2400 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen2 — practically the same tier on our index (85 and 82/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Galaxy S25 FE: Dynamic AMOLED 2X FHD+, 120 Hz; Honor Magic 5: Curved AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 45 W vs 66 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Camera: Galaxy S25 FE 50+12+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Honor Magic 5 54+50+32 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? With a similar chipset tier, the Honor Magic 5 suits price-first buyers; the Galaxy S25 FE suits those paying the difference for a specific row in the table (display, camera, capacity, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.