Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy S9 vs Redmi A3 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy S9 and the Redmi A3 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy S955 JOD | Redmi A3 Pro55 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 55 (estimate) | 55 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9810 | Helio G36 |
| Performance index | 36/100 | 15/100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Base storage | 64GB+ | 128GB |
| Display | 5.8" AMOLED 2K | 6.88" IPS LCD HD+ |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Rear camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Battery | 3,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 15 W | 18 W |
| Release period | March 2018 | August 2024 |
Who is the Galaxy S9 for, and who is the Redmi A3 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 55) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Galaxy S9 has a higher specification-based index (36 vs 15/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy S9: AMOLED 2K, 60 Hz; Redmi A3 Pro: IPS LCD HD+, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 15 W vs 18 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Redmi A3 Pro has 2,160 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S9 12 MP (1 lens) vs Redmi A3 Pro 32 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 55), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy S9 is higher on the chipset index (36 vs 15/100); the Redmi A3 Pro makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy S9 has a higher specification-based index (36 vs 15/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy S9: AMOLED 2K, 60 Hz; Redmi A3 Pro: IPS LCD HD+, 90 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 15 W vs 18 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Redmi A3 Pro has 2,160 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy S9 12 MP (1 lens) vs Redmi A3 Pro 32 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 55), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy S9 is higher on the chipset index (36 vs 15/100); the Redmi A3 Pro makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.