Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy F05 vs Galaxy S9 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy F05 and the Galaxy S9
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy F0555 JOD | Galaxy S955 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 55 (estimate) | 55 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Helio G85 | Exynos 9810 |
| Performance index | 25/100 | 36/100 |
| RAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Base storage | 64GB | 64GB+ |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD HD+ | 5.8" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+2 MP | 12 MP |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Battery | 5,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 15 W |
| Release period | September 2024 | March 2018 |
Who is the Galaxy F05 for, and who is the Galaxy S9 for?
Price: about the same (JOD 55) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Galaxy S9 has a higher specification-based index (36 vs 25/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy F05: IPS LCD HD+, 60 Hz; Galaxy S9: AMOLED 2K, 60 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 15 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy F05 has 2,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy F05 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Galaxy S9 12 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 55), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy S9 is higher on the chipset index (36 vs 25/100); the Galaxy F05 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Galaxy S9 has a higher specification-based index (36 vs 25/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy F05: IPS LCD HD+, 60 Hz; Galaxy S9: AMOLED 2K, 60 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 15 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Galaxy F05 has 2,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy F05 50+2 MP (2 lenses) vs Galaxy S9 12 MP (1 lens). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 55), so price does not decide it — the Galaxy S9 is higher on the chipset index (36 vs 25/100); the Galaxy F05 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.