Head to head · October 2026
Galaxy Z Fold 3 vs Redmi Turbo 4 in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the Redmi Turbo 4
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Galaxy Z Fold 3259 JOD | Redmi Turbo 4259 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 259 (estimate) | 259 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 888 | Dimensity 8400 Ultra |
| Performance index | 68/100 | 79/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable AMOLED | 6.67" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 12+12+12 MP | 50+2 MP |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 20 MP |
| Battery | 4,400 mAh | 6,550 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 25 W | 90 W |
| Release period | August 2021 | January 2025 |
Who is the Galaxy Z Fold 3 for, and who is the Redmi Turbo 4 for?
Price: about the same (JOD 259) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Redmi Turbo 4 has a higher specification-based index (79 vs 68/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy Z Fold 3: Foldable AMOLED, 120 Hz; Redmi Turbo 4: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Redmi Turbo 4 has 2,150 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy Z Fold 3 12+12+12 MP (3 lenses) vs Redmi Turbo 4 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 7.6-inch — with a visible crease); the Redmi Turbo 4 is a single-screen phone (6.67-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 259), so price does not decide it — the Redmi Turbo 4 is higher on the chipset index (79 vs 68/100); the Galaxy Z Fold 3 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Redmi Turbo 4 has a higher specification-based index (79 vs 68/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Galaxy Z Fold 3: Foldable AMOLED, 120 Hz; Redmi Turbo 4: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 25 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Redmi Turbo 4 has 2,150 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Galaxy Z Fold 3 12+12+12 MP (3 lenses) vs Redmi Turbo 4 50+2 MP (2 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 7.6-inch — with a visible crease); the Redmi Turbo 4 is a single-screen phone (6.67-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 259), so price does not decide it — the Redmi Turbo 4 is higher on the chipset index (79 vs 68/100); the Galaxy Z Fold 3 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.