Head to head · October 2026
Vivo iQOO 13 vs Vivo X200 FE in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Vivo X200 FE
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Vivo iQOO 13529 JOD | Vivo X200 FE529 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 529 (estimate) | 529 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Dimensity 9300+ |
| Performance index | 94/100 | 86/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 256GB+ |
| Display | 6.82" AMOLED 2K | 6.31" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+50+50 MP | 50+50+8 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 120 W | 90 W |
| Release period | October 2024 | June 2025 |
Who is the Vivo iQOO 13 for, and who is the Vivo X200 FE for?
Price: about the same (JOD 529) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 13 has a higher specification-based index (94 vs 86/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo iQOO 13: AMOLED 2K, 144 Hz; Vivo X200 FE: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 120 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X200 FE has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo iQOO 13 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X200 FE 50+50+8 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 529), so price does not decide it — the Vivo iQOO 13 is higher on the chipset index (94 vs 86/100); the Vivo X200 FE makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 13 has a higher specification-based index (94 vs 86/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo iQOO 13: AMOLED 2K, 144 Hz; Vivo X200 FE: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 120 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X200 FE has 500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo iQOO 13 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X200 FE 50+50+8 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 529), so price does not decide it — the Vivo iQOO 13 is higher on the chipset index (94 vs 86/100); the Vivo X200 FE makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.